Pollution, climate change, and shrinking habitats are driving major changes in flowering plant and pollinator populations. These include shifts in local abundance, population extirpations, range shifts, altered community composition, and reshuffled interactions. To date, evidence for these changes mostly reflect opportunistic efforts to collect occurrence data to document distributions. Coarse-scale perspectives on biodiversity change can be invaluable, especially when threats to rare habitats are widely distributed, but many changes occur slowly (decades) at such scales. Opportunistic occurrence data are therefore generally less useful for detecting short-term trends and monitoring the effectiveness of conservation policies. They are also typically biased for large-scale surveillance monitoring (Boyd et al., 2022) and rarely encompass both plants and pollinators, limiting our ability to estimate broad and fine-scale trends in populations and plant–pollinator interactions. Ecologists often prefer using plot-based methods for systematic surveys and monitoring, as these provide quantitative data on abundance and distributions. Resurveying such plots adds a time dimension, greatly enriching our understanding of how species abundances and distributions shift in response to drivers of global change. Monitoring and resurvey data remain scarce, leaving pictures of ecological conditions and change uncertain. Except for Switzerland and the UK, countries are slow to support systematic programs to monitor plants and pollinators.
The 23–24 May Paris symposium on ‘New solutions to monitor plants, pollinators and their interactions in a changing world’ brought scientists together to assess the state of plant and pollinator monitoring schemes in Europe and to ponder how these might be improved, extended, and coordinated (https://www.college-de-france.fr/fr/agenda/colloque/nouvelles-approches-pour-le-suivi-des-plantes-des-pollinisateurs-et-de-leurs-interactions-dans-un). This group met to review existing schemes, compare the trends and indicators they produce, and outline future needs for research and policy. These needs include expanding the number of plots, species and habitats monitored, the different methods (e.g. by citizen scientists) and how frequently they are surveyed; how to identify and locate plants and insects quickly and reliably (including new technologies); how best to coordinate plant and pollinator sampling; and statistical tools to integrate heterogeneous data and infer causal relationships.
Porcher, E., Bonnet, P., Damgaard, C., De Frenne, P., Deguines, N., Ehlers, B.K., Frei, J., García, M.B., Gros, C., Jandt, U., Joly, A., Martin, G., Michez, D., Pescott, O.L., Roth, T. and Waller, D. (2024). Can we harmonize the monitoring of plants and pollinators?. New Phytol, 244: 39-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.20038